Self-Evaluation. Flipping through the peer evaluations, I saw countless areas that needed progress in my speech. Even before these constructive criticisms were laid before me, I had already run through in my mind various factors that I seemed to have lacked. There was much regret in that I could not have done better that day, but all my hopes lie for future opportunities. When I was up there presenting my speech, I assumed that it would feel much longer than it had; this got me worried wondering whether my speech was too short. Other peers before me had given very lengthy speeches, but on the contrary, many people complimented the conciseness. Another factor that had me anxious was the speed of my deliverance. Although I was aware of the words leaving my mouth, and even though I felt it was a bit fast paced, I couldn't get myself to slow down during my speech. Later through the many assurances from friends that it had been fair, I was able to relax. Even though constructive criticisms are helpful and most definitely welcomed, it put me at ease to hear compliments and comments of reassurance.
I noticed many people rated my verbal skills with a favorable score, but my nonverbal skills were most always slightly lower. I cannot help but agree to this because even I was unaware of the gestures I was making during my speech. I feel that because I couldn't help being nervous, my brain didn't have the leisure to coordinate both physical and mental activities. And as one person pointed out, perhaps further practice or more sleep would have done me some good. Other points were hard to decipher from the given comments because people opinions varied on the same matter. Some would say my eye contact was well done and constant while others felt I needed to look off of the paper more often. It was similar for tone and audibility as well. However, the more specific comments helped me decide at what level I was at; and which aspects I need to strengthen. Since I have clearly been able to analyze my strengths and weaknesses, it almost gets me excited for another speech.
Sejin Paik: Priscilla Kim PE.pages
Wonkyung (Alena) Koo: Peer Evaluation of Speech- Priscilla Kim .pages
Jin Kwon: Priscilla.pages
Sarah Cho: Priscilla Kim.pages
Nathan Cho: Pris.pages
Daeun Lee: Priscilla Kim-Peer Evaluation of Speech.pages
Alice Ahn: Priscilla's Peer Evaluation of Speech (by Alice).pages
Ji Yoon Hyun: Peer Evaluation for Priscilla.pages
Lauren Kang: Priscilla evaluation (lauren).pages
Amy choi: Priscilla Kim speech- AmyChoi.pages
Cindy Choi: Priscilla Evaluation.pages
Kristie Lee:
Olivia Edwards:
Self-Evaluation.
Flipping through the peer evaluations, I saw countless areas that needed progress in my speech. Even before these constructive criticisms were laid before me, I had already run through in my mind various factors that I seemed to have lacked. There was much regret in that I could not have done better that day, but all my hopes lie for future opportunities. When I was up there presenting my speech, I assumed that it would feel much longer than it had; this got me worried wondering whether my speech was too short. Other peers before me had given very lengthy speeches, but on the contrary, many people complimented the conciseness. Another factor that had me anxious was the speed of my deliverance. Although I was aware of the words leaving my mouth, and even though I felt it was a bit fast paced, I couldn't get myself to slow down during my speech. Later through the many assurances from friends that it had been fair, I was able to relax. Even though constructive criticisms are helpful and most definitely welcomed, it put me at ease to hear compliments and comments of reassurance.
I noticed many people rated my verbal skills with a favorable score, but my nonverbal skills were most always slightly lower. I cannot help but agree to this because even I was unaware of the gestures I was making during my speech. I feel that because I couldn't help being nervous, my brain didn't have the leisure to coordinate both physical and mental activities. And as one person pointed out, perhaps further practice or more sleep would have done me some good. Other points were hard to decipher from the given comments because people opinions varied on the same matter. Some would say my eye contact was well done and constant while others felt I needed to look off of the paper more often. It was similar for tone and audibility as well. However, the more specific comments helped me decide at what level I was at; and which aspects I need to strengthen. Since I have clearly been able to analyze my strengths and weaknesses, it almost gets me excited for another speech.